Blog Post: My Sister, Guard your Veil; My Brother Guard your Eyes
I
found the style of both The Stuff that
Dreams are Made of and Death of a
Mannequin to both be reminiscent of a historical account; there was a matter-of-fact
tone in both pieces that I believe really tied together some of the themes that
were individually being introduced through these short stories. I believe the
tone that gave these pieces their ‘historical’ feel came from how closely both
of these pieces related to a difficult moment in Iranian history. In Azar
Nafisi’s story we get an attention to “the idea of return” (Nafisi 2). Which
seems to connect to why Nafisi returned to Iran after leaving and how he wrote
about this dictator that effectively pushed any progressiveness Iran was
experiencing back centuries “In one swoop the new rulers had set Iran back
nearly a century” (Nafisi 3). So when Nafisi returns from an enlightening time
in America, he is faced with a dictator that seems to force Nafisi to jump into
a new revolutionairy consciousness that was incubated by writers with “imaginative
sorcery – the writing of F. Scott Fitzgerald, Saul Bellow, Mark Twain, Henry
James, Philip Roth…and Ralph Ellison” (Nafisi 2). I really enjoyed the way Nafisi spoke about
this sorcery of the imagination, it seemed to be a through line in his piece
that symbolized what writing can do for a society falling into an evil dictatorial
abyss.
When
thinking about this through line I thought about a term I came across in
undergrad called ‘imagined alternatives’. Around this time is when I was
finding literature more interesting and worthwhile in my academic life.
Imagined alternatives referred to the transformative powers of literature. What
can be seen in every day life but with a twist (imagined alternative) to
society that brightens the pages. That same twist, if it can be acted out in
real life, can make a great positive impact on society and this is what Nafisi
seems to be calling on in this piece. “I have often asked myself in fact, how
it is that under the worst political and social conditions, during war and
revolution, in jails and concentration camps, most victims turn toward works of
imagination” (Nafisi 9). Nafisi closes his piece with the final form of the
evolution of his through line with the term “The Republic of the Imagination”
(Nafisi 11) that seems to give new breath and life to the power of imagination
and its possible effects on everyday society.
Death of a Mannequin shared
the same ‘historical account’ tonal feel as the first piece to me because of its
attention to a moment in Iran. What I thought was interesting was the symbol of
the mannequin. It seemed like it represented women’s bodies in this new and
awful dictatorship that seemed to grow more and more oppressive to women’s
rights as the years went on. It seemed that every time a mannequin was
censored, a woman lost her right to wear shorts in public and when they cut the
heads off the mannequin it seemed like women then had to be veiled from head to
toe. But there is also hope present in the writing of this piece “In 2005, dark
pink was high fashion in Iran. And the material of Islamic clothing is now more
delicate than it ever was” (Kar 36). In this piece there was also attention to
cultural customs and the decline of women’s freedom represented by the
mannequin. The attention to cultural customs was interesting because it
produced a final thought on the language in Iran, noting that there was not a
word in their language for ‘feminism’ “ In Iran’s official language, Farsi,
there is no actual word for “Feminism”. And a group of Iranian sociologists
claims that, of approximately 30 million women who live in Iran, a total of 29
million have never heard the word “feminism” in any other language either” (Kar
36). Language is power because it seems to be an underlying foundation of
society through connection and communication. This note to the effects of
cultural customs and “feminism” not being a word present in their language to
give power to was definitely worthy of exploring.
Hey Duane,
ReplyDeleteI also noticed quite a bit of similarities between the pieces. I think Group 3 chose very well when they picked which two stories to teach. Losing rights, especially for women, and the loss of individual identity that goes along with it is the topic of both pieces. And, as you said, the changes taking place during the revolution and the state of Iran beforehand were expressed to the reader in a very "matter-of-fact" way. The difference, I think, was the intent of each author. It seemed to me that they wanted their readers to take different, but not contradicting, messages away from their pieces. I think this makes them perfect pieces to study together.
-Erin