Random thoughts on The Charm Buyers
Howan’s use
of language, Chinese, French, Hakka and Tahitian is a wonderful way to create layers
of cultural and historic context. This is one of the main tensions in this book
and in Marc Antoine relationship with others in his life. Aurore, his older
French lover is a painter, an activist, a beautiful woman whom appears to readily
accept the contributions of men despite being well educated and married. She
explores the Ugly Tahiti; the colonization, the French government nuclear
testing program the oppressive social, cultural and gender roles of the people
of Tahiti.
“You don’t
know” no one will explain it to you becomes a reoccurring theme in the Charm
Buyers...I was struck by the fact that this is a plural noun not singular noun.
Marc Antoine “buys” a charm to save the life of Marie-Laure, which he pays
deeply for. In order for a magic charm to be effective, it must be secret and
you must be willing to sacrifice all that you hold most dearly. In many ways,
many of the characters are charm buyers, holding secrets and making great sacrifices
for love and to either achieve material success or to hold on to ancient ways.
Marc Antoine for all of his secrets was the most transparent character and as
the plot unfolds others true natures are revealed.
Two of
the things that I most appreciated was the structure of the novel and the
authors decision to narrate this from a male character. Howan was able to make
statements about beauty, the human tendency to be exploitive of things (ie. pearls),
persons, places of beauty which are considered to be less civilized. The use of
poetic language and these interspersing of these naked truth were afforded
greater credibility by virtue of them coming from Marc Antoine’s voices; it
felt less prone to victimization one might assign to a beautiful native girl.
The titles of the novel also gave structure to the book; Islands, Ghost, the
Charm, Chessboard and Hauhine all gave new territory to define and redefine the
places and characters, their relationships, and explore how they change over
time and how they endure. In many ways it read like a mystery as it invites the
reader to speculate , it engages you to draw your own conclusions, while
accepting that sometimes there is not always a neat conclusion and some things cannot
be known but that beliefs can be transcendent.
Hello, Lora
ReplyDeleteYou identify many interesting aspects to further analyze and explore in this rich text, that I would like to understood as well. You mention the illusions of the characters--their relationships with one another and the settings they inhabit; the concept of "not knowing" being a plural noun; and the mystery that is created in the structure of the text. All of these are great areas of inquiry. I also discussed the theme of illusions in the character relationships, but I also like the way you put it--"It is constructed of secrets and illusions; contradictions and dichotomies are the primary structure used in this book." What I did not notice, and now would like to explore, is the interpretation of the "you" in the phrase "you don't know" as a plural noun and not a singular one. This would imply a collective experience of many not knowing- the you-all over there don't know, and not simply a one-on-one transactional dialogue. I appreciate your analysis of all of the characters in some ways being a charm buyer of sorts, and keeping secrets that therest of the characters do not know. This is a community effort-"we" don't want you or them to know anyway. I also like your take on how the structure of the text itself, into distinct titled sections, allows the same pantheon of characters and relationships to be redefined, and further creates layers of mystery to this tale.