The Lens of the Body
Miguel Cervantes
Professor Abinader
English 203
9/3/17
Blog
Post 1: Tell Me Everything You Don’t
Remember
Living
in our bodies is an everyday experience of the extraordinary. In each and every moment, the daily routines
of our lives are governed by countless internal processes that allow us to
breath, move and engage with our world in a way that is entirely unique to the
human experience. The way we nourish
ourselves, interact with others and interpret the vast array of sensory
information around us is handily sorted by a harmonious cooperative of cells,
tissue, blood, bone and water. It is a
complex and dizzying array of tasks that keep our bodies afloat, yet we hardly
ever have to think about it, and as we go about the business of our lives we
begin to take the process for granted.
Movement, speech and coordination become second nature, and in the
process of this forgetting our minds move on to grander, more important things
in life.
And then,
somewhere along the way, usually through age, disease or the combination of
both, the rug gets pulled out from under us, and we begin to lose our grasp on
even the most basic faculties.
In Christine
Hyung-Oak Lee’s memoir, Tell Me
Everything You Don’t Remember, we are given an unsettling and ultimately
inspiring look into the life of a person whose essential processes of living –
her memory, cognition and fundamental coordination between her body and brain –
are stripped from her at a time when she feels most entitled to them. At age 33, Hyung-Oak Lee never expected to
suffer a stroke, but as we begin the journey of reliving this ordeal through
her unique lens, we quickly come to realize that the life she had in place –
her home, her husband, her job, and the fundamental sense of self-identity she
drew from them was based on a flimsy narrative that had her sleep-walking
through her life.
From the very
outset, Hyung-Oak Lee makes it clear that the incapacitating effects of her
stroke forced her to rethink the way she was living her life. It forced her to be still, to write
everything down, to relinquish her independence and become vulnerable and
dependent upon others. It was a journey
that was fraught with anger and frustration.
Yet these were the keys that opened the doorway to self-reflection,
moments where she was able to see her helplessness from a point of view that
looked at the body as a starting point, a catalyst that sparked insights into
the nature of life and the things we build around it – our identities, our
relationships and the self-constructed beliefs that we hold as sacred.
This is one of the
focal points that fascinated me.
Christine Hyung-Oak Lee started her journey from a position of
experiencing life through the lens of the body, and through that perspective
she had come to forge a self-narrative that allowed her to function in life as
most people would, building a home, career and relationship. Yet unbeknownst to her, there were piles of
baggage building up in the inner realms of her mental and emotional self. In Chapter 2 we learn about Christine’s
parents – her taciturn mother and stubborn father, for whom admissions of pain,
even severe pain, were tantamount to weakness.
From a very early age, the physical and the emotional were linked in
terms of suppression – one succeeded in terms of how much adversity could be
ignored, and by the time we find Christine in her own marriage, it is made
clear that silence and stoicism still go hand in hand. Two days after her stroke, returning home
from vacation, having already endured multiple episodes of serious
disorientation, confusion and exhaustion, Christine and her husband still had not
realized that something was seriously wrong:
“By
nature, during our drives, Adam and I never did talk much. We expected and enjoyed miles of comfortable
silence. And at that time, my new
cognitive functions weren’t yet tested.
We had also done that drive many times, preoccupied with thoughts of
work the next day and errands to run once home.
If there was talk, it was usually banal.
So the silence was infinitely ordinary.” (p. 20)
Living
day to day in our bodies has the curious effect of making us less aware of
them, as illustrated in the anecdote above.
Christine and her husband were, in essence, living out their days as
they always had, despite early warning signs that Christine was in trouble. Could there have been subconscious denial at
play? Was Christine in fact so immersed
in her life, so entrenched in her own bodily lens, that to even approach the
idea of disruption would take much louder and clearer warning signs? If this is so, then it is highly indicative
of the lens that we all share for much of our lives.
Disease, injury
and death always figure into our universal perception of the body as a fragile
thing, of life as fragile, but oftentimes that doesn’t translate into the
workings of our day to day mentality. We
live our lives in conscious expectation that most things will hold – our
country, our society, our bodies – and that what we did not accomplish this day
will most likely await us the next. And,
perhaps most importantly, we believe in ourselves as conscious daily
participants in a life that, like the larger structures around it, will hold
together. Will not undermine, or abandon
us. When that betrayal does occur, as in
war, our fundamental security is also shattered, and what was once a given for
our most cherished notions of stability must be re-arranged, or re-thought in a
way that allows us to continue.
And so it was with
Christine Hyung-Oak Lee.
Her stroke
shattered the fundamental illusion of living primarily through the body, ignoring
her emotions, ignoring the pain of her past and expecting that somehow, in the
hustle and bustle of her day to day life, she would escape what she described
as,
“…the hole in my heart that I tried
to dam up with other people’s needs and then filled with resentment.” (p. 1)
What is so
inspiring about all of this is Hyung-Oak Lee’s response to this life-shattering
event. Even something as severe as a stroke doesn’t necessarily have the power
to move one’s view beyond the body. But
Hyung-Oak Lee sees her stroke as a catalyst.
In depriving her of some of her most cherished and essential
capabilities, her stroke opens the doorway to a profound inner state of healing
that, alongside her physical recovery, enables her to go deeper into her own
sense of self-understanding, creating a newfound vision of her life that sees
health of mind and wholeness of spirit as foundational to the health of her
body.
This is a
wonderful lesson to take heed of, for we all experience moments where the body’s
lens becomes the clearest compass by which to navigate our lives. Left un-examined, this viewpoint can erode
our awareness of the mind’s vast potential, not just as an intellectual
storehouse, but as an infinite reservoir of spiritual and emotional strength. What we discover in Hyung-Oak Lee’s journey is
not a repudiation of the body, but a restoration of balance in the way we see
our bodies, reminding us that we are much more than the image of our day-to-day
selves, and that our minds are capable of feats that are extraordinarily
beautiful and unique.
Dear Miguel,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your eloquent response to this work. I appreciated your inclusion of the silence shared between Christine and Adam on the back from Tahoe. After having finished this book, the weight of this silence is so much more palpable and devastating, because it is now clear how much was held in the silence between them. Now communication had become so "banal" and "infinitely ordinary" that neither perceived or could have articulated anything disturbing about it. Such a powerful moment (and which, in my view, could have been sustained even longer!) that speaks to so much of their relationship, and to so much of Christine's "sleep-walking" through her own life.
I wonder, did you share my interest in learning more about Adam or feeling more of his personality earlier in the book? To me, he was a very bland character until page 93 or so, when we finally hear about how they met. Until then, I couldn't picture how he looked, or hear his voice, or his tone, or feel his presence, and even then, he felt more like a sketch than a fully-embodied person. I'd be curious to hear your thoughts!
I also liked your point at the end about the "restoration of balance" between the mind and body. Before reading your post, I had seen her narrative as insisting on the wisdom of the body, but it's true that it was her mind that probed her towards viewing the stroke as a catalyst, rather than a catastrophe. Perhaps it's more about harmony and relationship, than one trumping the other. Thanks for this insight.
Miguel
ReplyDeleteI appreciated the thoughtful, introspective quality of your comments. Wisely, and much like the author, you didn’t attempt to arrive at definitive conclusions about the impact that debilitating illness can have on our body, mind and emotions.
In much the same way that Christine analyzes the physical, intellectual and emotional impact her stroke has had on her, you wrote your observations in the spirit of an exploration, offering theories and analysis rather than trying to force a neat concrete summary of the book, of the effects of devastating illness, and of its particular meaning for you.
Christine has reached a degree of understanding about her life, her identity, and the way she has lived in the past; yet as long as she is living and being in the world, her exploration of her stroke and its impact on her life will continue as she continues to learn and evolve as a human being.
It is a never-ending process. No neat conclusions can be drawn.
I also appreciated your use of the lens as a device to examine the themes of the book. By alternating between a tight focus on Christine’s inner journey, to a wider focus on the impact that her stroke has had on others, to an even wider scientific focus on the workings of the human brain, and finally to broad universal observations on how Christine’s journey has relevance for us all as we journey towards a life lived with greater integrity, self-knowledge and presence, you have mirrored the ever-changing focus of the book.
A very thoughtful blog, and one that invites further conversation.
Lisa Patten
nice M, and you got some lovely responses here. part of what i think is interesting is how she had to observe herself to make this memoir work. So the question sits: reliable narrator? or"
ReplyDeletee